The perennial conflict between Israel and Iran is among the most incendiary and gnarled geopolitical rivalries to ever have marred humanity.

While both nations navigate through their respective military and political ambitions, the prospects of a direct confrontation grow ever larger. This article shall look into the processes of invasion in each country, the motivation behind such processes, and what that means on a global scale in relation to politics, economics, and security.

What to know about: The Road to the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election: What to Expect

Historical causes of the ill feelings between Israel and Iran go as far back as 1948, when Israel came into being, and even further to 1979, when the Islamic Revolution changed Iran.

During the time of the Shah, Iran had kept relations with Israel. That revolution made Iran a theocratic state with sheer anti-Israel policies and sentiments. Ideological changes like this, along with Iran's relations with militant groups like Hezbollah and Hamas, have added more fuel to the fire.

Traditionally, Israel has pursued an aggressive military policy in response to perceived Iran and proxies' threats. The tools have ranged from targeted airstrikes to intelligence and, recently, cyber warfare.

Until now, the IDF viewed the Iranian atomic program as an existential threat and, therefore, has conducted several preemptive strikes aimed at eliminating the Iranian military capabilities in Syria and Lebanon.

Israel has tried over the years to establish an elevated military posture along its northern border, through which frequent air raids have been carried out against Iranian targets within Syria.

The whole point is to cut off supplies and weapons to Hezbollah. Viewed in Israeli eyes as a direct threat, such actions are justified by the Israeli government as part of the premise that an Iran strong in military capacity would further empower terrorist organizations and destabilize the region.

On the other side, the military doctrine of Iran is asymmetric. It is dependent on proxy groups in its attempt to reach out and influence the peripheral regions around Israel without a direct confrontation.

In this context, IRGC comes out as a dominant player that supports various militia groups throughout the Middle East. Over the past years, Iran has been developing its military capabilities along with the emergent missile technologies and drone warfare.

The concept of deterrence underlines the Iranian doctrine, most of all with its nuclear aspirations. Despite international community's imposed sanctions and pressure from the diplomatic world, Iran has continued to work towards its nuclear programs and is feared to achieve nuclear capability any time soon.

The possibility of this change in the balance of power has triggered panic not only amongst the Israelis but also amongst the Americans and its allies.

Invasion by either country is complex and fraught with possibilities. A full-scale invasion of Iranian territory is a remote possibility for Israel due to the expectation of highly devastating retaliation. Instead, its pre-emption policy is focused on strikes and sabotage operations to cripple Iran's military capability before they become a serious threat.

On the other hand, Iran generally reacts to Israel through the use of surrogate groups striking at Israel and asymmetric warfare. Iran has demonstrated that it is not averse to conflict of low-order intensity, such as cyberattacks and missile strikes against Israeli interests in the region and elsewhere.

This continuous salvo-for-salvo approach speaks to the fragility of the balance of power and escalation potential.

The current tension between Israel and Iran has huge relevance with respect to how it may affect the world economy, in particular energy supplies. Both nations are at the center of critical oil and gas shipping lanes. Any increase in military hostilities can lead to the disruption of oil supply and price spikes.

The Strait of Hormuz, which sees a certain percentage of the world's oil shipped through it, is highly susceptible to Iranian military maneuvering. Any dispute that puts this chokepoint's security in danger would be felt through global markets, well beyond the Middle East.

 

The new rivalry between Israel and Iran has created a big difference politically in international affairs. For years, Israel has traditionally depended upon military and political support from the United States.

In turn, Iran has tried to position itself with countries hostile to U.S. influence in the region such as Russia and China. This has divided the two countries into a complex web of alliances and enmities, each seeking regional hegemony.

These tensions further complicate the prospect for peace in the Middle East. A deep-seated mutual distrust and a conflict of interests have hampered efforts toward negotiating a resolution.

The consequences of the Abraham Accords, which allowed Israel to normalize relations with a number of Arab states, have isolated Iran even further and have encouraged it to reinforce its alliances with anti-Israel factions.

The prospect of military conflict therefore creates a security environment that becomes a threat to international stability. An armed confrontation between Israel and Iran could escalate quickly, drawing in regional and global powers. A possibility also exists that such a wider conflict may draw in the United States, its allies, and other such forces. Such a war would bring disastrous implications for the parties directly involved, as well as for the international security structures.

The Israel-Iran conflict is multilayered, touching on national and global politics, economics, and security. The chances that things will get out of hand are very high, with both nations making their military moves and ideological rivalries.

The world looks with trepidation to these two major players, knowing full well that a miscalculation may bring dire results. Indeed, it is complicated, and an understanding of this nature is necessary to further diplomatic efforts toward the maintenance of stability in this highly volatile region.

Only by talking and negotiating well can a permanent solution be achieved, and only then the path opened toward a more peaceful future.

Tensions Abound: The Complex Geopolitics of China-Taiwan Relations