For most governments, national security is still the highest concern in creating immigration laws' framework. Taking the events of September 11, 2001 as an example, it is pretty clear how immigration perception changed for countries and how it has been run-in particular in the United States-is unmistakable.
Since then, laws have come into place to ensure that borders are safe and the people arriving will not pose a threat to the country. These are combined with ever-rising levels of intelligence surveillance and security checks, along with a whole litany of regulations for the purpose of vetting individuals even further.

While there can be little doubt that security is a fundamental consideration, overplayed security automatically evokes xenophobia and a culture of fear. Severely restrictive policies can stigmatize immigrants in ways that play into public discourses that portray them as prospective criminals and terrorists. Such sets of narratives undermine social cohesion, foster divisions within communities, and detract from the inestimable contribution that immigrants can and often make to society.

Other than that, it is important to discuss the angle of immigration's impact on the economy. Most countries would lean on immigration to complete their workforce shortages, particularly in industries that are relevant to economic growth, such as agriculture, construction, and healthcare. Immigrant people provide an enormous contribution to economic development through work, business ownership, and expenditure.

Research supports the consensus that immigrants drive innovation and job creation. For instance, studies find that most of the tech startups in Silicon Valley are immigrant-led, holding the key to technological advancement and economic growth. Besides, demographic evidence on a hostile population shows that several developed countries require a larger share of younger workers to support economic growth and finance social services.

However, it is indeed against the economic gains of immigration that have to be weighed against the impacts on job loss among native workers.
The critics further argue that the inflow of low-skilled workers would drive wages down and increase competition for jobs. All such concerns require a balanced approach toward policies that are friendly to immigrants but provide the native workforce with a chance for training and adaptation toward changing job market prospects.

Aside from the question of security and economic issues, immigration speaks to humanitarian concern. It is in the plight of the refugees and asylum seekers-out of violence, persecution, and poverty-that implores the moral obligation of nations to respond with compassion to those in need. International laws, such as the 1951 Refugee Convention, bind countries to protect individuals fleeing their home countries for fear of persecution.

The large elements of humanitarian aspects in immigration policy usually get submerged beneath the rhetorical torrent of political interests and concerns about security.
Most times, national interests override the humanitarian responsibilities, and often access to asylum or basic rights has become restricted to immigrants. Indeed, the recent global refugee crisis stirred by conflicts in Syria, Afghanistan, and other regions has exposed the inadequacy of current immigration systems in many countries.

It is hard to strike a balance between humanitarianism and security, economic interests. Whereas asylum procedures in countries must be efficient and fair, the dignity and respect of the seekers of refuge are to be protected. This equally requires international cooperation, since migration transcends borders.

Immigration policy is a problem intermingled with security, economy, and humanitarianism. It calls for open communication and a consultative process from the leading policy actors, taking into consideration all interested parties: native citizens, immigrants, and various groups and their advocacy organisations.

1. Stricter Safety Measures: As much as national security is important, the measure should be evidence-based and not fear-based. Governments can invest in technology and training that will enhance the security of the borders without violating the rights to entry for people who come into the country.

2. Economic Integration Programs: Competition for jobs seemingly promotes economic integration programs by governments to support both immigrant and native workers in dealing with shifting labor market conditions. These programs may include anything from job training initiatives and language classes to entrepreneurship assistance in opening businesses in new communities.

3. Humanitarian Asylum Processes: Immigration policies are primarily to protect the most vulnerable populations. An effective asylum process, including legal representation and dignity toward those seeking refuge, is of utmost importance in making humane the immigration regime.

4. Community Engagement: A dialogue between the immigrant and native communities will help dispel myths and xenophobia. Community-level programs may be designed and implemented to promote cross-cultural contact that allows people to come closer and promotes more social cohesion.